Truth(s) About 9/11? (Happy 9/11!)

Justin Raimondo at AntiWar.com provides a logical starting point on this heavy-monickered (word preference from the clown world) day with the before and after version of 9/11's truth(s).

The "official" 9/11 narrative doesn't make sense

These are quite a bit different from the official fairy tale of 19 cavemen (apologies to GEICO for stealing their innuendo) who are competent enough to fool the mightiest military power (by measureable fire power) in the history of the world, fly across the frequency barriers while NORAD is "otherwise engaged" and plunge the world into a New Depression (mainly with box cutters and Faux News propaganda). Alan Sabrosky details the Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond for us on this increasingly trivialized eighth anniversary. (Emphasis marks added - Ed.)

A significant development in the 1990s was the formation of the neo-conservative think tank known as PNAC (Project for a New American Century), whose members prepared position papers for the Israeli government and for a future US Administration sharing their views. That happened in 2000 with the election of George W. Bush, and a contemporary writer summarized the tip of the neo-conservative iceberg in his first Administration this way:

The "outsiders" from PNAC were now powerful "insiders," placed in important positions from which they could exert maximum pressure on US policy . . . PNAC had a lock on military policy-creation in the Bush Administration.

Especially significant in terms of subsequent events was the acknowledgement in one of PNAC's own documents that their program for America (and Israel) would not readily be accepted by the American people. What this meant, PNAC opined in 2000, was that "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."

Professor David Ray Griffin (The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False) is interviewed by Michel Chossudovsky here, and he and Jacques Marcille of Montreal 911 Truth have an almost unbelievable amount of detail to add to this increasingly suspect dish (best served cold). Jacques Marcille also provides insights on 911 Truth and media disinformation. View this incredibly fantastic video of the World Trade Center buildings perfectly imploding into themselves, lit up only by two rather small airplanes with their somewhat depleted fuel supply and some dynamite infrastructure. (Not to mention Building 7 which must have collapsed from the sympathy it felt for the other two as it was neither hit by an airplane nor suffered fire damage from the jet fuel.) Tom Engelhardt at the TomDispatch has Rebecca Solnit's complete essay on How 9/11 Should Be Remembered - The Extraordinary Achievements of Ordinary People, which I recommend to all who would like to be able to see any positive side to this concocted nightmare event.

One 9/11 widow has a new outlook.

In the days and months that followed, I worked tirelessly to find out the rest of what happened. My questions started small - Which tower? What floor? - and became thornier. Why did this happen? What was the government's involvement? What were the last minutes of his life like?

. . . After all these years of painful blank spaces - after government mishandling, after grievous disappointment, after 9/11 conspiracy theories and 9/11 commissions and 9/11 fictions fused with fact - I would have what I wanted. I would have answers.

Would that we all did.

Do yourself a favor and read through these articles at your leisure. It's impossible to read them all in the same sitting: your mind will be boggled. Alert the EMS! Suzan

(Note: Even if these theories are proved to have "holes," they aren't in the ballpark of the whoppers in the official story.) _________________________