Thanks, Tom! (He's so not funny.)
Obama Has Bipartisan Support for Syria Strike
D.C. Kabuki Theater (Just In Time)
Alden Pyle was Graham Greene's Quiet American, who was employed by a US economic venture that masqueraded for the OSS/CIA's intelligence penetration around 1952 in US-sponsored pre-Thieu/Gen. Ky Vietnam. (In every important scene in the movie, there is an ominous figure lurking . . . looking (Joe Tunny, CIA).)
If anyone thinks Greene didn't understand or portray precisely the idea of Americans' unique belief in their own innocence - and goodness (its mythical, ever-present Third Way response in every troubled country (run by American interests)) floating around MSM coverage now like laughing gas, then you need to read some more Greene.
Before our world blows up any further.
If you haven't seen the movie with Michael Caine and Brendan Fraser yet, please do. I recommend it.
From the reviews:
This fabulous novel by one of the 20th century's greatest writers explores issues of guilt, complicity, and redemption in the context of the very early years of America's intervention in Vietnam.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
"I never knew a man who had better motives for all the trouble he caused," Graham Greene's narrator Fowler remarks of Alden Pyle, the eponymous "Quiet American" of what is perhaps the most controversial novel of his career. Pyle is the brash young idealist sent out by Washington on a mysterious mission to Saigon, where the French Army struggles against the Viet Minh guerrillas.
As young Pyle's well-intentioned policies blunder into bloodshed, Fowler, a seasoned and cynical British reporter, finds it impossible to stand safely aside as an observer. But Fowler's motives for intervening are suspect, both to the police and himself, for Pyle has stolen Fowler's beautiful Vietnamese mistress.
Originally published in 1956 and twice adapted to film, The Quiet American remains a terrifiying and prescient portrait of innocence at large.
- Powells.com
"A continuously intriguing piece of storytelling .... Greene has brought into vivid relief ... the fearful price of innocence — and has shown that behind innocence there lurk unconscious arrogance and a self-righteous streak of moral blindness."
- The Atlantic
"Unless I am very much mistaken, The Quiet American is as near a masterpiece as anything else I have ever read in the last twenty years."
- Daily Express (London)
"The best novel written about the war in Indo-China."
- Chicago Sun-Times
“It's you, Pyle. It's you they all answer to . . . that Third Force they all talk about. They answer to you."
“God save us always,' I said 'from the innocent and the good.”
“He was impregnably armored by his good intentions and his ignorance.”
“Innocence always calls mutely for protection when we would be so much wiser to guard ourselves against it: innocence is like a dumb leper who has lost his bell, wandering the world, meaning no harm.”
"Sooner or later ... one has to take sides. If one is to remain human.”
“I could never have been a pacifist. To kill a man was surely to grant him an immeasurable benefit. Oh yes, people always, everywhere, loved their enemies. It was their friends they preserved for pain and vacuity.”
Thomas Fowler: Colonel The.Dialekton is a milk-based plastic (supplied by Americans to the South Vietnamese forces) - also used as a plasticizer in explosive compounds.
Hinh: [Correcting him] General The.
Thomas Fowler: Who made him a General?
Hinh: He did.
The problem with the now two-centuries-long continuing American innocence-thus-goodness philosophy (and its implementation by mediocrities like Bremer and Wolfowitz and Rice and Clinton - and I'm just mentioning State Dept. wiseguys) is that one must undoubtedly believe the now-constant promotion that inherent innocence is a very good (if not the best) reason for the unintentional intentional killing of millions of innocents.
Innocents killing innocents.
If anything that goes by the name of belief in anything is left to us.
There are other prevailing beliefs on this issue (and always have been) but lacking proper force to effectuate their implementation. Senator Alan Grayson stands up proudly for these.
As the debate regarding a U.S. military attack on Syria shifts to Congress, Congressman Alan Grayson was back on national TV on Sunday, forcefully arguing against war:
Fredricka Whitfield: Joining me from Orlando, [Florida Congressman Alan Grayson] opposes any intervention [in Syria] at all. So, after hearing the President yesterday, Mr. Congressman, did the President say anything to change your mind?
Congressman Alan Grayson: No. It's not our responsibility. It's not going to do any good. It's dangerous. And it's expensive.
Fredricka: And what do you mean by that, when you say it won't do any good, when you hear Secretary Kerry spell out that letting a dictator like Assad go with impunity means that it sends a message to other dictators who might have chemical weapons that they could harm their people as well?
Alan: Well, actually, there are only four countries in the world that have chemical weapons, and the largest is the United States. So are we trying to "send a message" to ourselves? That's not logical. I've heard that theory before, that somehow one country's actions will affect another country, and another country, and another country. It's just the "domino argument" [from the Vietnam War] again. We'll call it the "bomb-ino argument" here. It's just not logical. It doesn't make any sense.
Fredricka: So when the President and Secretary of State say that Syria threatens national security and that it behooves the United States to do something, you [still] say that this is not a national security issue?
Alan: Absolutely not. And there are a huge number of Americans who agree with me. We set up a website called "DontAttackSyria.com," and got over 10,000 signatures in less than 24-hours. The polls show that people understand that this literally has nothing to do with us. We are not the world's policeman. We can't afford this anymore, these military adventures that lead us into more than a decade of war. It's wrong. We need to cut it off, before it even happens.
Fredricka: Is it at least comforting then to you, that the President, though he said he thinks justifiably that the U.S. should strike, still wants to hear Congressional approval? Is that any comfort to you, that he wants Congress to be thoughtful about this, and to give the green light or not?
Alan: Yes. In fact, the British went through the same process a few days ago and they came to the right conclusion. We're not the world's policeman. We're not the world's judge, jury, and executioner. No one else in the world does things like this, and there's no reason why we should. We've got 20 million people in this country who are looking for full-time work. Let's tend our own garden, for a change.
Fredricka: Now, you mention your [website] DontAttackSyria.com and that there are a number of signatures, a number of people on board with your point of view, but what about fellow Members of Congress? Where do you believe their allegiance will fall?
Alan: Their allegiance will fall with what makes sense for them in representing their districts. In my district, if you ask people, "Where does Syria fall in your list of concerns?" it wouldn't even be in the top 100. We would have to spend the billion dollars that this attack will cost, according to British authorities. The billion dollars that this attack will cost, that money is better spent on our schools, our roads, our bridges, our health care, and so on and so forth.
Fredricka: So if you had the opportunity to make your case to the President, what would it be? We understand that Senator McCain will be spending some one-on-one time with the President tomorrow. Senator McCain has been saying for a very long time that the U.S. needs to act. If you had that kind of face-to-face time with the President, what would you say to him as to why the U.S. should not go [through with] this - whether it has allies or whether it means going in alone?
Alan: Well, in fact, all the indications are that we will be going in alone. Even French public opinion is overwhelmingly against this, and the French were the only ones entertaining this possibility. It should tell the President something that when he is trying to vindicate so-called "international norms," that there are 196 countries in the world and no one else, NO ONE, wants to do anything like this. But what I would tell the President is, first, that no Americans have been attacked. None of our allies have been attacked. It's an unfortunate circumstance, but there are lots of unfortunate circumstances in the world. In Burma, for example, [there is now] a civil war that started 10 years before I was born, and twelve Presidents have resisted the impulse to interfere in the Burmese Civil War, even though far more people have died in the Burmese Civil War than in the Syrian Civil War.
And I could give you countless other examples. Sometimes the highest international norm, the one to respect the most, is to mind your own business. And in this case, [military intervention] simply won't do any good. No one thinks that we're going to determine the outcome of the Syrian Civil War by lobbing a few missiles into Damascus. No one thinks that we will degrade or even eliminate the possibility of future chemical attacks by doing so. And in doing so, we'll be wasting a lot of money, and we'll be opening ourselves up to a counterattack. People forget this, but the U.S. Embassy in Beirut is 15 miles away from the Syrian border, and just down the block from Hezbollah. So if we attack them, and then they attack us, I think people can see where this is headed.
Fredricka: Congressman Alan Grayson, thanks so much, from Orlando today. We appreciate it.
Alan: Thank you.
Congressman Alan Grayson - you know where he stands. If you want to make your voice heard, then join our petition at www.DontAttackSyria.com. Tell your friends and neighbors, too. Time is running out.
The video below (and it's a good summary of the movie) is in English.
2 comments:
In a world where Obama is a 'Peace' Laureate and Tony Blair is a 'Peace' envoy, where do I sign up to be a Sex God?
Almost anywhere it would seem, T.
And in a world of mysterious gas attacks you should take care about whatever you're claiming.
I'm thinking "power consolidator" has a nice ring to it currently.
Post a Comment