Monday, February 10, 2014

Defeat Deception! Alan Grayson and Dr. Lee Rogers For Congress! (Win Joni Mitchell Art Print Never Offered For Sale Before - Random Drawing) Who's Paying Obamatrons? (Revolt Outside The Media Spotlight)

I think I've mentioned several times before how much respect and admiration I have for Joni Mitchell's artistry (and good works).

Senator Alan Grayson, another one of my favorite people/artists (if you believe that political actors can also be artists) has an imaginative offer for us that will benefit everyone politically.

Except for the bad guys, of course.

From our friend at Down With Tyranny! we learn the details.

Last week, the Washington Post reported that the Koch brothers are already pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into ads meant to demonize Alan Grayson and defeat him in November. Today, Blue America is launching a Joni Mitchell contest to help raise some campaign cash for Grayson's reelection in the very expensive Orlando media market. Grayson also requested that we ask our donors to give to Lee Rogers as well, a friend and political ally running a tough campaign to win the seat Buck McKeon is giving up just north of L.A. "I like Lee Rogers," Grayson explained. "But that’s not why I’m asking you to support his run for Congress."

I respect Lee Rogers, because he is the doctor who founded and directed the Amputation Prevention Center, and reduced amputations by 72%.  But that’s not why I’m asking you to support his run for Congress.

I know that we need a progressive doctor like Lee Rogers in Congress, to help Drs. Ami Bera and Raul Ruiz (D-CA) counter the demented ravings of Drs. Paul Broun (R-Paleolithic), Scott DesJarlais (R-Patient Dating), Michael Burgess (R-Fetal Wanking) and Larry Bucshon (R-Guns).  But that’s not why I’m asking you to support Lee Rogers’s run for Congress.

I’m asking you to support Lee Rogers for Congress, because we have to win a seat like his to turn the U.S. House of Representatives blue.

…Please contribute to the Lee Rogers for Congress campaign today. Every dollar counts, because every person counts.

Do it for Nancy Pelosi, to make Nancy - the first female Speaker of the House - Speaker once more. Do it for me, so that I can push through all of our legislation for justice, equality and peace. Do it for yourself and the people you love, so that all of us can enjoy the blessings of good government.

This time we're running the "contest" a little differently. The basic rules are the same: just contribute any amount to Alan and Lee on this special Joni Mitchell page - or, if you're strapped for cash and want a chance to win, send us a post card telling us so at P.O. Box 27201, Los Angeles, CA 90027.

What makes this contest different is that we're giving away 4 Joni Mitchell art prints (18" x 24") and Grayson suggested that we choose four random winners! Everyone has a lot better chance to win one of the rare, collectible Joni prints - four times better - that have never been offered for sale for any amount of money.

If you're on this mailing list, you probably already know why we think Alan Grayson is the most essential - the best - Member of Congress. But what you probably do not know is why Alan Grayson counts himself among the world's most devoted admirers of Joni Mitchell's work. He picked the prize and this little essay he wrote will help you understand why:

170 Beautiful Words
by Alan Grayson

Howie Klein asked me to explain to his Blue America audience my fondness for Joni Mitchell songs. I decided to explain by example. Here are the lyrics - just 170 words - for one of Joni’s less famous songs, “For Free,” from her album Ladies of the Canyon (1970):

I slept last night in a good hotel.
I went shopping today for jewels.
The wind rushed around in the dirty town,
And the children let out from the schools.
I was standing on a noisy corner, waiting for the walking green.
Across the street he stood, and he played real good,
On his clarinet, for free.

Now me, I play for fortune, and those velvet curtain calls.

I've got a black limousine and two gentlemen, escorting me to the halls.
And I play if you have the money, or if you're a friend to me.
But the one man band, by the quick lunch stand,
He was playing real good. For free.

Nobody stopped to hear him, though he played so sweet and high.
They knew he had never been on their TV’s, so they passed his music by.
I meant to go over and ask for a song, maybe put on a harmony.

I heard his refrain, as the signal changed.

He was playing real good. For free.

Here are some reasons why I love this song, all 170 words of it:

(1)  I can see it. I can picture Joni Mitchell standing on that noisy corner, waiting for the walking green.

(2)  With just a few images - “hotel,” “jewels,” “limousine,” “escorts” - Joni paints the enormous perks of success, matter-of-factly, without bragging.

(3)  With one single sentence, Joni succinctly draws the Venn diagram of everyday life for the today’s successful people - “I’ll play if you have the money, or if you’re a friend to me.”

(4) Joni concedes that success, including her success, is not always deserved, nor is anonymity. “They knew he had never been on their TV’s, so they passed his music by.” Fame begets fame, with or without talent. (If you don’t believe Joni on this, then ask Kim Kardashian.)

(5) A random meeting, a chance encounter. You notice something beautiful that other people seem to be overlooking. A man playing the clarinet. A pretty cloud in the sky. A clever bumper sticker on a car. The lines in your own palm. Are you open to that, or are you just too busy?

(6) I wonder what happened at the end. Did Joni ask him for a song? Did they put on a harmony? I’m not sure, but I don’t think so, because those would have been forms of payment, and he was playing real good - for free. But as I said, I’m not sure what happened at the end - and I really would love to know.

Well, my exegesis on the song is now considerably longer than the song itself, so I’ll stop. But here’s the thing - all of Joni Mitchell’s songs are like this. Dense. Poetic. Brimming with deep and yet casual insights into the way people are. And that’s putting aside the gorgeous musical compositions, and Joni’s surreal voice.

What is the meaning of life? I’m not sure, but I sense that it’s somewhere in there, suffusing the songs of Joni Mitchell.

Again, here's where you can support Alan Grayson and Lee Rogers and enter to win one of the 4 Joni Mitchell prints. One of them, in fact, is pictured on the top of this page. Let me just leave you with something Lee Rogers told us about Grayson: "As a doctor, I know most people use their guts for digestion. But, Rep. Alan Grayson uses his guts for a more constructive purpose.

He stands up for the voiceless and underrepresented as a Congressman. Sadly, unless you're one of the 0.01% that donates significant money to fill the coffers of politicians, you're probably one of those underrepresented by Congress. Alan is your voice. I greatly admire Alan for having the guts to stand up to nearly everyone and almost single-handedly prevent an American war in Syria. He's bold and 'tells it like it is.' Those are qualities I hope to emulate in Congress and I'm honored to have his support in my election."

Who's paying Obama and his secrecy-loving trons again?

The same people who paid his Mother when she worked for USAID/CIA/NSA?

I'm not trying to be controversial (or conspiratorial (but definitely editorial)), but you've got to start being a little bit suspicious when you realize that no one, repeat NO ONE (except a kissy-faced PBS con job - "Thanks, Kochs!) has said a word in six months (6 MONTHS!) about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) which is coming to take the rest of our economy away from us with its allegiance to international super self-dealing on wheels big business.

The former US Trade Representative Ron Kirk, suggested to Reuters, that disclosing what it contained would “raise such opposition that it could make the deal impossible to sign.” Obama then proceeded to continue the secrecy by trying to push fast track trade promotion authority through Congress. This would have prevented Congress from seeing the text or holding hearings so the public could weigh in before Obama signed the treaty.

We now have some solid independent media reporting for us.


People Powered Media Mobilizes Masses, While Mass Media Remains Silent

By Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers

In the last week there were two major examples of how people-powered media can educate and mobilize people even if the mass corporate media does not report on an issue. We now have the ability to educate each other and tell our narrative of what is occurring.  The movement is not dependent on the corporate media.

We are in the midst of an era of media transition. The corporate media is facing tremendous financial, employee and audience challenges. At the root of their problem is credibility.  In 2004, Gallup reported that “39 percent currently say they have ‘not very much’ confidence in the media’s accuracy and fairness, while 16 percent say they have ‘none at all.’” Gallup reported this was the lowest credibility rating in three decades.  But, the decline continued and by 2012 Gallup reported that distrust of the media had risen by 5 percent to 60 percent having little or no trust in the media—a new record.  A 2013 Gallup poll found only 1 in 4 Americans trust television or newspaper news.

At the same time technology has given rise to a new people-powered media. People can now turn their telephones into a video outlet and their social networks into a newspaper. Repeatedly we have seen someone publish a video from their phone and make national news. Any individual can go onto social networking outlets and reach thousands, if not tens of thousands of people in this new democratized media. Others create blogs that gain mass followings. Cities have groups like the DC Media group, citizen activists from the occupy movement, or like the Media Mobilizing Project in Philadelphia building media teams. And, through activist organizations, news that is not covered in the media is shared widely. One reason we created Popular Resistance was to provide coverage of the burgeoning movement for social and economic justice that is building in the United States and around the world, but ignored by the mass media. People can even get a daily movement news report in their email every morning.

This people-powered media builds on the long developing independent media. The independent media has built mass readership as the Internet has developed. Outlets likeAlterNet, Common Dreams, Truthout, Counterpunch, Dissident Voice, Firedoglake OpEd News, Z Communications, Nation of Change, Global Research, the Peoples Voice, LA Progressive and Truthdig reach more than ten million people each month. They are joined by movement media outlets like Black Agenda Report, ROAR Magazine, Waging Nonviolence,, Labor Notes, In These Times, Jacobin and Tidal among others, that report and analyze the movements actions, theory and issues. As you can see from this list, there is a wide variety of news alternatives beyond the corporate media. In fact, the web-based independent media has much more diversity than the narrow range of opinion allowed in the corporate media. New media projects like the Omidyar-Greenwald “First Look Media” will experiment with a new form of independent media, building on the multi-decade independent media that already exists.

We’re also seeing rapid change in video and radio outlets. The Real News shows video from around the world and provides analysis not seen on cable or network news coverage. The Resistance Report provides video coverage of the movement and its actions. Global Revolution TV shows us revolts happening around the world live and reports on global movements. There has also been an explosion in alternative radio. Our weekly show is onWe Act Radio, there is Occupy the Airwaves, Occupy Radio and the Progressive Radio Network to name a few; and who knows what the impact of the new low powered FM stations will be. Then there are foreign networks like RT America, Press TV and Al Jazeera. Another interesting media outlet developing an important niche is Huffington Post Live. All of this is providing alternative views than traditional mass media.

And, investigative journalism is changing. As traditional media outlets cut their staff and reduce spending on investigative journalism, new technology is resulting in an explosion of inside information being made public. Wikileaks has developed technology that provides new ways for people to anonymously blow the whistle producing more news than all investigative reporting by the corporate media combined. The Freedom of the Press Foundation is making SecureDrop, an open source submission platform for whistleblowers available to media outlets. This will be another avenue for whistleblowers in government and big business to expose unethical behavior or criminal activity. We know many independent media outlets are developing investigative teams. In a few years investigative journalism will see a new golden age, all coming from outside the corporate media.

There is a vibrant independent and citizens media movement that offers readers and viewers a lot of alternatives to the traditional media. The corporate media seems stale and stagnate in comparison to the media outside the traditional bounds. The future seems to be with people-powered media, not corporate-powered media. This is one more reason Pew reports 31 percent have stopped relying on traditional media.

A Successful Revolt Outside The Media Spotlight

Sometimes the problem is not falsehoods in the media but acts of omission, i.e. not reporting important information. An example of that has been around the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). A report this week by Media Matters confirms that there has been virtually no network coverage of the TPP over six months – ABC, CBS and NBC did not cover it at all, PBS had one story that was favorable of the TPP. And, if you don’t count Ed Schultz, cable TV (FOX, CNN and MSNBC) have only done one story on the TPP. This is an embarrassing lack of coverage of the largest trade agreement since the WTO. It is hard to not see this as an intentional decision by the mass media.

There is no question the strategy of the Obama administration was to pass the TPP without people knowing about it. They classified the text as secret so that even the few members of Congress who have gone through the hurdles to see it are not allowed to talk about it. The former US Trade Representative Ron Kirk, suggested to Reuters, that disclosing what it contained would “raise such opposition that it could make the deal impossible to sign.” Obama then proceeded to continue the secrecy by trying to push fast track trade promotion authority through Congress. This would have prevented Congress from seeing the text or holding hearings so the public could weigh in before Obama signed the treaty.

As a result of this secrecy, a year and a half ago very few people knew about the TPP even in the activist community. But today, almost everyone who is politically active is aware. Not only are they aware but they have massively mobilized. In the last ten days Congress has received nearly 600,000 emails and more than 40,000 phone calls opposing fast track trade promotion authority.

Weekly twitter storms have made #StopTheTPP a trending phrase reaching millions and last week a Thunderclap across social media reached 5.4 million people. Wikileaks leaked two important chapters on the environment and intellectual property as well a third showing deep divisions among the negotiators.

The massive education through the people-powered media resulted in widespread protests. There have been protests throughout the country multiple times when national, global or intercontinental days of action were called. There have been stand-alone protests around the country like this Nancy Pelosi event that was interrupted or this fundraiser that President Obama, Majority Leader Reid and Minority Leader Pelosi attended. The US Trade Reps office has been covered in banners and protesters have appeared outside their meetings. Communities are passing resolutions saying that they will not obey the TPP if it passes and calling for trade justice.

All of this has resulted in fast track trade promotion authority being seriously stalled in both Houses of Congress. In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid said he has no plans for a floor vote on fast track. The new chairman of the Finance Committee, Senator Ron Wydensaid he is not rushing to push fast track. In the House, there has been an uprising among Democrats against Obama’s call for fast track with three-quarters of House Democrats publicly saying they oppose fast track, along with two dozen Republicans – even more in both parties are opposed but have not made public statements. Speaker John Boehnersays he will not bring fast track to the House Floor without 50 Democrats publicly supporting it. The number two Democrat, Rep. Steny Hoyer, says he is “not optimistic” about a trade bill passing this year.

A mass movement against the now controversial TPP developed without any coverage in the corporate mass media. This is an important display of the power of the independent and people-powered media, perhaps like we have never seen before. Despite conscious efforts to keep TPP out of the news media and under the Congressional radar, the public has exposed it. A poll released this week showed cross-partisan opposition in the public with 62 percent of Americans saying they oppose fast track for the trade deals. The TPP was made toxic despite efforts at keeping the public ignorant.

Friday Night Release Before the Superbowl Fails to Hide Controversial Report

It is not only the media that is the problem. As we wrote last week, the government and economic elites cannot tell us the truth because they know people will mobilize in mass revolt. Sometimes when the government is taking an unpopular action, their strategy is to release the information on a Friday night since the media is understaffed and covers even less news on Saturday.

One of the more unpopular projects the government is trying to push through on behalf of the very powerful oil industry is the Keystone XL Pipeline. This would bring bitumen tar sands through the heart of the bread basket of America and over much of the fresh water of the United States to be refined in Texas and then shipped out through the Gulf of Mexico abroad for big oil profits. To try and draw as little attention as possible to the State Department’s final environmental impact statement, the State Department released the report on the Friday night of Superbowl weekend.

While the corporate media may have been off-duty, the people-powered movement against tar sands, the KXL pipeline and extreme extraction for energy was immediately active. Reactions poured out that night over twitter, Facebook, social media, email lists and organizational websites. The news was out—the State Department report was out, now it was up to Obama to deny the pipeline. If he fails to stop the KXL, climate justice activists said, it will be the biggest mistake of Obama’s presidency.

Obama had put forward a climate test—if the KXL significantly exacerbated the problem of carbon pollution he would not approve it. Activist commentators spread the word that the State Department report demonstrates the pipeline fails Obama’s own test. As Francis Beinecke summarized it:

“The State Department concluded that the pipeline would put heartland communities, farms and ranches in harm’s way. It would expose thousands of critical waterways, aquifers, and wells to the threat of tar sands oil spills — spills the State Department said are much harder to clean up than conventional crude. And it would carry oil for export to foreign ports, leaving the U.S to bear all the risks.

“Most significantly, the State Department reported that the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline could accelerate climate change by pumping more carbon pollution into our air. The surge in pollution would be similar to putting up to 5.7 million extra cars on the road, the review said.”

Not only were climate justice activists educated overnight but they also immediately began to mobilize. More than 200 protests were announced that weekend to be held on Monday across the country with Americans urging the KXL Pipeline to be rejected. Native Americans frequently at the front of environmental battles over gas and oil extraction and transport promised an “epic battle” over the pipeline if it was approved. People in the Democratic Party base promised to stay home on Election Day if Obama approved the pipeline.

Already, the Obama administration has announced delay, saying a decision will not be made until the president hears from the EPA, Energy Department and other federal agencies and prepares its own report. This is probably a stall tactic to get through the mid-term elections because the President has all of the information he needs right now to reject the pipeline.

Once again an effort to keep an unpopular decision out of the news failed, not because the mass media exposed it, but because the people-powered media and movement got the word out, educated and mobilized people.

Next Test and the Future

This Tuesday there will be another test of the people-powered movement. The coalition that defeated the Internet-destroying laws SOPA and PIPA have joined together for “The Day We Fight Back” challenging NSA and other security state mass surveillance. More than 4,000 websites have signed up to participate in a web-based protest against dragnet surveillance.

Banners will be published on the websites (including Popular Resistance) leading people to take action and call and email their legislators. No doubt you have not read about this protest in the Washington Post or New York Times or heard it reported in the corporate media. Once again, it will be a showing of the people-powered media and social movement organizing itself without traditional media coverage. Stay tuned and participate. We’re expecting impressive results.

Those in the media and government are well aware that the people-powered media is a growing threat because of the Internet. There are constant battles to be fought to keep the Internet open and free so that information can flow democratically and everyone has access. A recent court decision threatens the ability to keep the Internet open, but the government still has the power to do so. The people-powered movement is joining in solidarity to prevent the destruction of the Internet.

One of our main ongoing tasks is to break through the “official truth” put out by the government and repeated by the corporate media. We need to break through with the actual truth, to describe reality so people know what is going on around them. Fortunately, a growing number of people understand the importance of their role as media outlets.

The interesting thing about the recent success we have seen is that the people-powered media is still in its infancy. There is no overt organization to it. People spread the word and share information without any coordinated plan to do so. People concerned about the direction of the country seem to take action organically and tell their friends, family, colleagues and Internet contacts what they have learned.

Educating each other through social media is not the whole of the movement—people also have to be mobilized in a strategic and sustained fashion acting together toward a common goal within a national strategic framework. But we should not underestimate the importance of creating our own media because building a mass movement begins with education. Activists should be aggressive in sharing information through their outlets. At Popular Resistance, our daily digest provides you with news you can share in your networks to educate vast numbers of people. We need to think of ourselves as media outlets, build our networks, expand our audiences and share relevant information widely and regularly.

The corporate media, working with government, has lied us into wars that have cost the lives of hundreds of thousands and the treasures of nations; they have created fear and hatred so that many accept destruction of our freedom and mass surveillance of our communications; they have lied to us about the safety of extreme energy extraction so our environment is put at risk; and they have pushed corporate policies that enrich the wealthiest with public dollars while destroying social programs and falsely claiming they are helping us.

If we continue to build the independent, people-powered media, greater numbers of people will build up immunity to the destructive misinformation of corporate media. To build the media we need, each of us must act with the intention to build it and use it in a consistent and strategic way.

Remember, you are the media; and the media matters.

This article is produced by in conjunction with AlterNet. It is based on’s weekly newsletter reviewing the activities of the resistance movement.

Kevin Zeese, JD and Margaret Flowers, MD are participants in; they co-direct It’s Our Economy and co-host Clearing the FOG. Their twitters are @KBZeese and MFlowers8.

This article was published at Nation of Change at:

No comments: