Saturday, November 21, 2015

Why Did Anyone In NC Vote for Thick-Headed Thom Tillis?  (Crossroads GPS Dark $$$$$$$)  One Chart That Should Make Americans Wake Up

New Tax Documents Show Crossroads GPS Poured Millions Into 2014 North Carolina Senate Race

Group supplied nearly all funds to North Carolina 'dark money' group

November 17, 2015
Crossroads GPS, one of the nation’s largest politically active “dark money” nonprofits, quietly supplied millions of dollars in 2014 to other politically active nonprofit groups seeking to influence the midterm elections, according to new tax filings reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.
One group received nearly all its money from Crossroads GPS:  Carolina Rising, a North Carolina-based group that sprang up and spent almost all its money running thousands of TV ads that boosted now-U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis in what was one of the nation’s most hotly contested Senate races.
Crossroads GPS reported giving Carolina Rising $4.82 million, or roughly 99 percent of its revenue. The group appears to have received only one other contribution, for $60,000, according to a tax filing posted by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group that last month filed a complaint against Carolina Rising with the Internal Revenue Service.
Crossroads GPS and Carolina Rising are both “social welfare” nonprofits organized under section 501(c)(4) of the U.S. tax code. Such nonprofits have assumed new, high-profile roles in the wake of the Supreme Court’s "Citizens United v. FEC" decision in 2010.
Their nonprofit status means they aren’t required to reveal their donors, making the source of the money behind the Carolina Rising ads — filtered through two different layers of anonymity — nearly impossible to penetrate.
Crossroads GPS — together with a related super political action committee, American Crossroads, that does reveal its donors — spent nearly $49 million directly on the 2014 elections, all supporting Republican candidates, according to campaign finance data tracked by the Center for Responsive Politics.
The two groups were co-founded by Karl Rove, a political strategist and former advisor to then-President George W. Bush.
Targeting the Senate
But the new tax filing shows Crossroads GPS also gave millions in additional money to other groups that were active in the crucial 2014 elections, when the parties battled fiercely over control of the U.S. Senate.
Republicans won, and the new documents prove Crossroads’ influence was far larger than the public knew.
Crossroads GPS gave $5.25 million to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the behemoth business lobby that spent $35.5 million on the midterm elections, almost all of which supported Republican candidates. Chamber-backed candidates won big.
Scott Reed, the Chamber’s senior political strategist, was not immediately available to comment on the Chamber’s relationship with Crossroads GPS. A spokeswoman for the Chamber declined to comment.
Crossroads GPS gave $2 million to the American Future Fund, an Iowa-based group that spent about $3 million during the 2014 elections on House and Senate races, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
The Kentucky Opportunity Coalition, another “social welfare” nonprofit on the Crossroads GPS grantee list, boosted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., during his hotly contested re-election bid last year.
Ahead of that election, the Kentucky Opportunity Coalition spent more than $14 million on advertising — and accounted for about one of every seven TV ads in the contest. Most of the group’s ads praised McConnell and his support for Kentucky’s coal industry, or criticized McConnell’s Democratic opponent, Alison Lundergan Grimes, who ultimately lost the race.
The Kentucky Opportunity Coalition received $390,000 from Crossroads GPS.
Reached by the Center for Public Integrity, Scott Jennings, a spokesman for the Kentucky Opportunity Coalition, declined to comment.
Not so ‘diverse’
The fact that Carolina Rising received nearly all of its money from Crossroads directly contradicts what Dallas Woodhouse, now the head of the state Republican Party, told the Center for Public Integrity in a November 2014 interview.
 In November, Woodhouse said Carolina Rising was funded by multiple donors, and the organization had “a large, diverse donor body.”
He did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment on the Crossroads GPS grant, or questions from the Center for Public Integrity regarding the apparent contradiction with his earlier comments.
He has said Carolina Rising spent roughly $4.7 million on the Tillis ads, or roughly all its money. In addition, he has repeatedly described the ads as nonpolitical issue ads because they didn’t explicitly tell voters to vote for or against anyone.
Revenue at Crossroads GPS jumped to more than $69 million in 2014 from a low of about $3.4 million in 2013, a non-election year.
Spending soared, too, from slightly more than $4 million to nearly $66 million.
Crossroads GPS reported receiving 80 contributions of $5,000 or more during 2014, including one for $20.6 million and another for $14.5 million.
The group spent more than $13.6 million on grants to other groups, all described as for the purpose of “social welfare.”
In response to a request for comment on the grants, Crossroads GPS spokesman Ian Prior said they were not made for political purposes.
 “We made grants to other non-profit organizations to promote the (c)4 mission of Crossroads GPS,” he said in an email. “We are confident based on our written agreements with each one of those non-profit organizations that our grants were used for the non-political purposes that they were given.”
Michael Beckel contributed to this report.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _                                             

One Chart That Should Make Americans Wake Up

(Click on chart to enlarge.)

Utilization of America's Production Capacity Has Been on a Steady Decline

Utilization of America’s Production Capacity Has Been on a Steady Decline
By Pam Martens and Russ Martens

November 18, 2015
Thanks to the Occupy Wall Street movement and more recent cross-country stumping by Senator Bernie Sanders, millions of Americans have awakened to the frightening reality that corrupted power in America is now fully engaged  in running an institutionalized wealth transfer system cleverly masquerading as an economic model. As Senator Sanders has reminded the tens of thousands turning out to hear him speak:
The U.S. has the greatest income and wealth inequality of any other major developed country;
One percent of the population now controls a greater share of pre-tax income than at any time since the 1920s, (the last time Wall Street was legally allowed to gamble for the house with bank deposits);
The top one-tenth of one percent of the super elite own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent;
Since Wall Street imploded under the weight of its own corruption in 2008, destroyed the U.S. economy, used taxpayer money to bail itself out and reward the financial elites with millions of dollars in bonuses and golden parachutes, only the poor and middle class have paid the price. The one percent have reaped 58 percent of all income gains since the crash.
In addition to the inhumanity of this economic model, which has left one in every five American children living in poverty and 52 percent of Americans unable to raise $400 in an emergency (according to a 2014 Federal Reserve study), this model is also the fast track to the demise of America as an economic engine.
Above is the Capacity Utilization rate for total industry in the United States since the 1960s. This is a measure of how much of our productive capacity at plants and mines and utilities are actually being used in response to demand. Lower rates of utilization mean there is too much slack in the economy with not enough people able to afford to buy the goods or output that could be produced at 100 percent utilization. Low and declining levels of capacity utilization are completely consistent with high levels of income inequality. This also invariably leads to plant closings, layoffs, and, thus, a continuing vicious cycle of less disposable income, more slack, more layoffs, more plant closings.
If America was truly on the right track, would our plants and utilities have been operating at 85 percent of capacity in the 70s, 80s and 90s, and now only operating at 77.5 percent as of this October – despite trillions of dollars spent on unprecedented fiscal stimulus, Fed loans to Wall Street and three rounds of quantitative easing since the crash?
Wall Street’s money grab is crippling America and our children’s future and ill-conceived trade deals by the power elite are accelerating the downward trend. There is no better way to understand the real threat of declining Capacity Utilization rates than this excerpt from a piece by Andy Harshaw posted at the web site of the steel manufacturer, ArcelorMittal, on June 23, 2015:
“High levels of capacity utilization are hallmarks of successful steel companies. In order to optimize our assets, ArcelorMittal USA must find ways to achieve higher levels of capacity utilization with no loss of total production or market share.
“Record levels of steel imports – up 70 percent for flat carbon products alone since 2013 – have consumed typical market demand that domestic steelmakers like ArcelorMittal would normally serve. As a result of this and other market forces, many of our key assets are running at relatively low capacity utilization levels, and they have been for quite some time.
“Let’s focus on one example, our hot strip mills (HSMs) in the U.S., which average only 70 percent utilization. This means that they aren’t producing roughly 30 percent of the time, even though we are paying the costs associated with operating and maintaining those assets as if they were operating 100 percent of the time. Each of the companies’ four largest HSMs in the U.S. requires an average of $39 million per year in repair and maintenance just to keep them operating. On the whole, our U.S. operations require more than $1 billion in repair and maintenance costs each year.
“It is not sustainable to operate multiple HSMs at low utilization rates when the same volume of steel could be produced by fewer HSMs at higher utilization rates…
“For our facilities to succeed there is no doubt we need a stronger U.S. market, where imports compete fairly rather than via unfair trade practices to gain market share. We also need the right set of assets that match the geographic reach of our customers, a skilled workforce that embraces the competitive forces at play in our industry while being cost conscious on all fronts. Companies that adapt to changing conditions will survive; those who refuse to change will continue to fill the coffers of the bankruptcy lawyers.”
Bankruptcy lawyers, Wall Street CEOs, and beneficiaries of Washington’s gold-plated revolving door are doing just fine in America. We need a President and a Congress that genuinely care about the rest of Americans.

No comments: